Regiment31 Editorial Standards and Evidence Policy
Regiment31 publishes practical hair-care education for people with curly, coily and textured hair. Our goal is to make routines, product use and evidence easier to understand without overstating what cosmetics can do.
Why we publish educational content
Hair challenges can affect confidence, and confusing or exaggerated claims make it harder to choose a sensible routine. We create articles to help readers care for their hair more gently, understand product directions and recognize when a concern may need professional evaluation.
Experience and authorship
Regiment31 was shaped by years of hands-on experience caring for and styling other people’s hair and seeing how hair concerns affect self-esteem. Educational articles combine that practical perspective with research from authoritative sources. Articles are published under the Regiment31 editorial team rather than attributed to a medical professional unless a qualified reviewer is specifically named.
How we use evidence
• We prefer primary research, government resources and guidance from established professional organizations.
• Health-adjacent articles link directly to the sources used whenever practical.
• We distinguish research about an individual ingredient from evidence about a finished product.
• We do not imply that an ingredient study proves a Regiment31 formula produces the same result.
• We state important limitations and avoid presenting preliminary findings as settled facts.
Cosmetic benefits versus medical claims
Regiment31 products are cosmetics. We may describe benefits such as softness, slip, manageability, shine, a moisturized scalp, reduced breakage or healthier-looking length when they accurately reflect the product’s intended cosmetic use. We do not claim that a product diagnoses, treats, cures, reverses or prevents alopecia, dandruff or another medical condition without appropriate product-specific evidence and regulatory review.
Sudden, severe, patchy or persistent hair loss—as well as scalp pain, bleeding, sores or significant irritation—should be evaluated by a qualified healthcare professional.
How content is prepared
Topics are selected because they answer real questions about curly and coily hair care. Drafting and organization may be assisted by digital writing tools. Before publication, content is reviewed for usefulness, source quality, claims language, internal consistency and relevance to Regiment31 customers. Automation is not used as a substitute for evidence, product knowledge or professional medical judgment.
Product references and independence
Some educational pages link to Regiment31 products when they are relevant to the routine being discussed. A product link does not change our evidence standards. We explain realistic product limitations and do not present a cosmetic as medical treatment.
Dates, updates and corrections
Important educational pages include a reviewed or updated date. We revisit content when source guidance, product information or recommendations materially change. If you notice a factual error, broken source or unclear statement, email info@regiment31.com. Substantive corrections will be made as promptly as practical.
Customer reviews
Customer reviews describe individual experiences. They are not clinical evidence and do not guarantee that another customer will have the same result. Reviews should not be interpreted as medical advice or proof that a product treats a disease.
Our promise to readers
We will favor clear, useful and supportable information over dramatic promises. When evidence is uncertain, we will say so. When a question requires diagnosis or medical treatment, we will direct readers to an appropriately qualified professional.
Last reviewed July 2026. These editorial standards apply to Regiment31 educational pages and may be updated as our review process develops.